Eight arrested in Phelps Fiasco
WIS10 reported today that Sheriff Leon Lott has arrested eight people in connection with Michael Phelp's now famous bong hit in Columbia, S.C.:
We've now learned that since investigators began trying to build a case, they've made eight arrests: seven for drug possession and one for distribution. These are arrests that resulted as the sheriff's department served search warrants.We've also learned that the department has located and confiscated that bong.
Sources say the owner of the bong was trying to sell it on eBay for as much as $100,000.
The owner, who wasn't even at the party, is one of the eight now charged.
Apparently, everyone wants to know why is Sheriff Lott going after Phelps, why isn't he focusing on more important crime? What the hell - he loves the publicity. What could be more important than re-election? A photograph of Michael Phelps smoking weed in Columbia, S.C. was like a gift from God on Lott's doorstep. People can call him an idiot all they want, he has made national news and he is happy as he can be.
Everyone is debating whether Lott can even do anything - simple possession of marijuana and possession of paraphernalia are misdemeanors punishable by 30 days and a 500$ fine, respectively. Apparently, Lott could not force Phelps to come back and face charges if he wanted to, because a crime must carry at least one year as a potential sentence for extradition to South Carolina. If Phelps did come back, the glaring question is how will they prove possession when they don't have any marijuana in the first place? Technically, they could go forward with a prosecution without any physical evidence (although this is debatable), but for practical purposes that prosecution is dead in the water.
Norm Kent, at NORML.org, has his own analysis of Lott's legal problems in going forward with a case against Phelps, and concludes:
In essence, I suspect that very soon the Sheriff will publish a statement that after ‘due diligence,’ his ‘investigation’ revealed an insufficient basis upon which to proceed.And maybe the next time Mr. Phelps gets caught with marijuana he will stand up and courageously say: “It’s normal to smoke pot. I am an Olympic gold medal winning athlete and it has not impaired me one bit.”
If he does, I will invite Michael to join the NORML advisory board. I will even buy him his own bong.
One thing that this fiasco has done is to once again bring the ridiculousness of marijuana prohibition to national attention. According to TheState.com:
The executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws said arresting Phelps - an unlikely scenario - would make the swimmer a symbol for the need to change laws governing the drug. "It may bring short-term pain and embarrassment, but for Michael, this will instantaneously make him a national and, because of his Olympic status, an international poster child to finally reform these laws," said Allen St. Pierre, who promised the sheriff a NORML T-shirt and lifetime membership if he arrests Phelps.
Comments
I haven't got a clue myself, but although you say the have no marijuana, isn't there a pretty good chance they'll find some residue on the bong? Wouldn't that plus witnesses get them what they need?
And then, do you think Sheriff Lott will roll out the armored personnel carrier for prisoner transport? I'll bet he hopes so...
Posted by: Windypundit | February 11, 2009 10:36 AM
I doubt that there will be residue on the bong if the guy was trying to sell it on EBay. If there is significant residue, technically a charge of SPM could be made, but it would be a waste of time. I cannot see a jury anywhere convicting someone of SPM based on residue - it is poss. paraphernalia at best.
I think Sheriff Lott would love to show off his tank for the national media. Stay tuned.
Posted by: BFrederick | February 11, 2009 11:05 AM
Seems to me that Sheriff Lott is going after all of his partymates in an attempt to get them to turn against Michael.They could say it was all his.
Lott can't bring Michael back here to face charges on simple possession. But he can for distribution.
On a side note, I would think that bank robbers may find Columbia is the place to go..if you're not smoking a joint while doing it, you probably won't get the attention of the Sheriff's Dept.
Posted by: Kathy | February 11, 2009 11:33 AM
Forgive me for being ignorant, but how can a photo produce sufficient evidence for a drug possession arrest for the 8 partygoers? Unless officers went to these people later and found pot on them, but the photo alone shows no one but Phelps in the picture, smoking "something" out o f a bong. Could someone please enlighten me?
Posted by: Carrie | February 11, 2009 1:48 PM